svpg
FREE newsletter

Subscribe via RSS

Subscribe

Tag Cloud

product management product discovery management company culture product portfolio planning product owner product development process product strategy product manager product marketing user experience design great products innovation marketing agile scrum project management user testing engineering prototype testing

Browse by Date

  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • HOME
  • Services
    • Product Management
    • Product Marketing
    • Technology
    • User Experience
    • Public Workshops
  • Articles
    • Index
    • Blog
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Company
    • Team
    • Manifesto
    • Contact Us

Measuring Product Managers

Posted by Marty Cagan on May 12, 2007

Tags: product management, company culture, management

Very often I’m asked how product managers should be measured. I have long believed that the only true measure of the product manager is the success of his or her product. While I still believe that, it’s not a very satisfying answer, as it’s not clear what the best way to measure a product’s success is. Is it revenue? Profit? The number of users? Page views? All of these indicators can be useful but they don’t really provide the big picture.

Recently, a business metric has been gaining traction across a number of different industries, called the Net Promoter Score (NPS). You can read all about it if you like at www.netpromoter.com. It’s a very simple metric. You ask your customers how likely they would be to recommend your product, on a scale of 0-10. Those that rate 9 or 10 are considered “promoters” (they’re out there telling their friends how much they love your product, and are actively evangelizing for you); those that rate 7-8 are lukewarm or neutral; and those that rate 0-6, the “detractors,” are not likely to recommend your product, and may even be actively warning their friends about your product. If you take the percentage of promoters and subtract the percentage of detractors, you get the NPS. This essentially tells you if you have more people cheering for you or against you.

Quite a few companies already track this metric, and those that rate very highly won’t surprise you – companies like Apple, Amazon and eBay.

I very much like this metric because it puts the focus on the product and the overall customer experience. If, as we like to say in this business, it’s all about creating happy customers, then this is a measure of exactly that.

Yes, in theory you could have 100% very happy customers but you go out of business due to losing money on every customer, but for a single metric, I believe this keeps the focus of the company on creating happy customers, which is what fuels growth. And in terms of profitability, there is no more cost-effective sales or marketing program than your own customers doing the sales and marketing work for you, so I have long believed that a great product with happy customers lowers these other (often very significant) costs, which contributes to profitability.

This leads to the concept of good revenue and bad revenue. For example, let’s say the company is approached by a big potential sponsorship or advertising partner, that covets your user base and believes they can effectively sell their product on your site. This could be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on how it’s done.

If it’s done poorly, the short-term revenue might be nice, but if it hurts your customer experience, it will be reflected in the NPS, and your business will grow more slowly, or worse. On the other hand, if you can work collaboratively with the advertising partner, if it’s done well, it could be either neutral to the customer experience or even contribute to the experience, which will help your business grow more quickly.

This is why “specials” are so dangerous. They represent bad revenue, and hurt your company’s ability to deliver products that create happy users.

You can compare your NPS across companies and even across industries, which is interesting, but to me this is most useful as a way to measure your own progress towards improving your products and services. So if you don’t already measure your NPS, consider doing so as soon as possible. Then you can start watching how the changes you make to your products impact this score. Make sure you’re always moving in the right direction, and consider the impact on the NPS of everything you do.


  • Product Management
  • Product Marketing
  • Technology
  • User Experience

© 2009 Silicon Valley Product Group. All rights reserved.